Problem Overview
We evaluate the 3D spatial relationship between two drone trajectories L 1 L_1 L 1 β and L 2 L_2 L 2 β and compute the perpendicular clearance distance to verify collision avoidance envelopes.
Step-by-Step Mathematical Solution
Step 1: Formulate Vector and Parametric Equations
State the Parametric Equations of a Line :
r β ( t ) = r β 0 + t v β \vec{r}(t) = \vec{r}_0 + t\vec{v} r ( t ) = r 0 β + t v
(Defined in Equations of Lines in 3D .)
Drone 1 (L 1 L_1 L 1 β ): Through P ( 2 , 0 , 1 ) P(2, 0, 1) P ( 2 , 0 , 1 ) with v β 1 = β¨ 1 , 2 , β 1 β© \vec{v}_1 = \langle 1, 2, -1 \rangle v 1 β = β¨ 1 , 2 , β 1 β© :
x 1 ( t ) = 2 + t , y 1 ( t ) = 2 t , z 1 ( t ) = 1 β t x_1(t) = 2 + t, \quad y_1(t) = 2t, \quad z_1(t) = 1 - t x 1 β ( t ) = 2 + t , y 1 β ( t ) = 2 t , z 1 β ( t ) = 1 β t
Drone 2 (L 2 L_2 L 2 β ): Through Q ( 1 , 3 , 2 ) Q(1, 3, 2) Q ( 1 , 3 , 2 ) with v β 2 = β¨ 2 , β 1 , 1 β© \vec{v}_2 = \langle 2, -1, 1 \rangle v 2 β = β¨ 2 , β 1 , 1 β© :
x 2 ( s ) = 1 + 2 s , y 2 ( s ) = 3 β s , z 2 ( s ) = 2 + s x_2(s) = 1 + 2s, \quad y_2(s) = 3 - s, \quad z_2(s) = 2 + s x 2 β ( s ) = 1 + 2 s , y 2 β ( s ) = 3 β s , z 2 β ( s ) = 2 + s
Step 2: Classify the Spatial Line Relationship
State the Line Classification Protocol :
(Defined in Relationships Between Lines in Space .)
Parallel Test: Check direction vector proportionality:
2 1 β β 1 2 β
β βΉ β
β v β 1 β¦ v β 2 ( NotΒ Parallel ) \frac{2}{1} \ne \frac{-1}{2} \implies \vec{v}_1 \nparallel \vec{v}_2 \quad (\text{Not Parallel}) 1 2 β ξ = 2 β 1 β βΉ v 1 β β¦ v 2 β ( NotΒ Parallel )
Intersection Test: Set r β 1 ( t ) = r β 2 ( s ) \vec{r}_1(t) = \vec{r}_2(s) r 1 β ( t ) = r 2 β ( s ) :
{ 2 + t = 1 + 2 s ( 1 ) 2 t = 3 β s ( 2 ) 1 β t = 2 + s ( 3 ) \begin{cases} 2 + t = 1 + 2s & (1) \\ 2t = 3 - s & (2) \\ 1 - t = 2 + s & (3) \end{cases} β© β¨ β§ β 2 + t = 1 + 2 s 2 t = 3 β s 1 β t = 2 + s β ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) β
From (1): t = 2 s β 1 t = 2s - 1 t = 2 s β 1 .
Substitute into (2):
2 ( 2 s β 1 ) = 3 β s β
β βΉ β
β 4 s β 2 = 3 β s β
β βΉ β
β 5 s = 5 β
β βΉ β
β s = 1 2(2s - 1) = 3 - s \implies 4s - 2 = 3 - s \implies 5s = 5 \implies s = 1 2 ( 2 s β 1 ) = 3 β s βΉ 4 s β 2 = 3 β s βΉ 5 s = 5 βΉ s = 1
Then t = 2 ( 1 ) β 1 = 1 t = 2(1) - 1 = 1 t = 2 ( 1 ) β 1 = 1 .
Test ( t = 1 , s = 1 ) (t=1, s=1) ( t = 1 , s = 1 ) in equation (3):
1 β ( 1 ) = ? 2 + ( 1 ) β
β βΉ β
β 0 β 3 ( Inconsistent ) 1 - (1) \stackrel{?}{=} 2 + (1) \implies 0 \ne 3 \quad (\text{Inconsistent}) 1 β ( 1 ) = ? 2 + ( 1 ) βΉ 0 ξ = 3 ( Inconsistent )
Because the system is inconsistent and the direction vectors are non-parallel, L 1 L_1 L 1 β and L 2 L_2 L 2 β are Skew .
Step 3: Compute Perpendicular Clearance from P ( 2 , 0 , 1 ) P(2, 0, 1) P ( 2 , 0 , 1 ) to Line L 2 L_2 L 2 β
State the Point-to-Line Distance Formula :
d = β₯ Q P β Γ v β 2 β₯ β₯ v β 2 β₯ d = \frac{\|\vec{QP} \times \vec{v}_2\|}{\|\vec{v}_2\|} d = β₯ v 2 β β₯ β₯ QP β Γ v 2 β β₯ β
(Defined in Distance Between a Point and a Line in Space .)
Displacement vector from reference point Q ( 1 , 3 , 2 ) Q(1, 3, 2) Q ( 1 , 3 , 2 ) to P ( 2 , 0 , 1 ) P(2, 0, 1) P ( 2 , 0 , 1 ) :
Q P β = β¨ 2 β 1 , β
β 0 β 3 , β
β 1 β 2 β© = β¨ 1 , β 3 , β 1 β© \vec{QP} = \langle 2 - 1, \; 0 - 3, \; 1 - 2 \rangle = \langle 1, -3, -1 \rangle QP β = β¨ 2 β 1 , 0 β 3 , 1 β 2 β© = β¨ 1 , β 3 , β 1 β©
Cross product Q P β Γ v β 2 \vec{QP} \times \vec{v}_2 QP β Γ v 2 β :
Q P β Γ v β 2 = β£ i ^ j ^ k ^ 1 β 3 β 1 2 β 1 1 β£ = β¨ ( β 3 ) ( 1 ) β ( β 1 ) ( β 1 ) , β
β ( β 1 ) ( 2 ) β ( 1 ) ( 1 ) , β
β ( 1 ) ( β 1 ) β ( β 3 ) ( 2 ) β© \vec{QP} \times \vec{v}_2 = \begin{vmatrix} \hat{i} & \hat{j} & \hat{k} \\ 1 & -3 & -1 \\ 2 & -1 & 1 \end{vmatrix} = \langle (-3)(1) - (-1)(-1), \; (-1)(2) - (1)(1), \; (1)(-1) - (-3)(2) \rangle QP β Γ v 2 β = β i ^ 1 2 β j ^ β β 3 β 1 β k ^ β 1 1 β β = β¨( β 3 ) ( 1 ) β ( β 1 ) ( β 1 ) , ( β 1 ) ( 2 ) β ( 1 ) ( 1 ) , ( 1 ) ( β 1 ) β ( β 3 ) ( 2 )β©
Q P β Γ v β 2 = β¨ β 3 β 1 , β
β β 2 β 1 , β
β β 1 + 6 β© = β¨ β 4 , β 3 , 5 β© \vec{QP} \times \vec{v}_2 = \langle -3 - 1, \; -2 - 1, \; -1 + 6 \rangle = \langle -4, -3, 5 \rangle QP β Γ v 2 β = β¨ β 3 β 1 , β 2 β 1 , β 1 + 6 β© = β¨ β 4 , β 3 , 5 β©
Compute magnitudes:
β₯ Q P β Γ v β 2 β₯ = ( β 4 ) 2 + ( β 3 ) 2 + 5 2 = 16 + 9 + 25 = 50 = 5 2 \|\vec{QP} \times \vec{v}_2\| = \sqrt{(-4)^2 + (-3)^2 + 5^2} = \sqrt{16 + 9 + 25} = \sqrt{50} = 5\sqrt{2} β₯ QP β Γ v 2 β β₯ = ( β 4 ) 2 + ( β 3 ) 2 + 5 2 β = 16 + 9 + 25 β = 50 β = 5 2 β
β₯ v β 2 β₯ = 2 2 + ( β 1 ) 2 + 1 2 = 4 + 1 + 1 = 6 \|\vec{v}_2\| = \sqrt{2^2 + (-1)^2 + 1^2} = \sqrt{4 + 1 + 1} = \sqrt{6} β₯ v 2 β β₯ = 2 2 + ( β 1 ) 2 + 1 2 β = 4 + 1 + 1 β = 6 β
Calculate distance d d d :
d = 5 2 6 = 5 3 = 5 3 3 β 2.89 Β meters d = \frac{5\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{6}} = \frac{5}{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{5\sqrt{3}}{3} \approx 2.89\text{ meters} d = 6 β 5 2 β β = 3 β 5 β = 3 5 3 β β β 2.89 Β meters
Engineering Conclusion
The perpendicular clearance distance between waypoint P P P and flight corridor L 2 L_2 L 2 β is 2.89 Β m 2.89\text{ m} 2.89 Β m . Because d = 2.89 Β m β₯ 2.0 Β m d = 2.89\text{ m} \ge 2.0\text{ m} d = 2.89 Β m β₯ 2.0 Β m , the flight plan fulfills FAA safety clearance criteria and no emergency avoidance maneuver is triggered.