β—€ Back to Note

Tony's Intertwingled Memex β€’ Reference Manual

Optoelectronic LED Display Panel Average Irradiance (Entertainment & Electrical Engineering) Solution

Formulas & Definitions

An entertainment and electrical systems engineer at the UNLV Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering is designing a modular, high-dynamic-range LED stage display panel for an interactive performance venue on the Las Vegas Strip.

The modular rectangular panel measures 0.5Β m0.5\text{ m}0.5Β m in width along the xxx-axis and 0.4Β m0.4\text{ m}0.4Β m in height along the yyy-axis, occupying the closed rectangular domain:

R=[0,0.5]Γ—[0,0.4](unitsΒ inΒ meters)R = [0, 0.5] \times [0, 0.4] \quad (\text{units in meters})R=[0,0.5]Γ—[0,0.4](unitsΒ inΒ meters)

Because of resistive thermal heating along the internal power busbars and localized LED driver clustering, the emitted radiant surface irradiance E(x,y)E(x, y)E(x,y) is non-uniform across the panel surface and is characterized by the empirical polynomial model:

E(x,y)=E0(1+4x2y)(W/m2)E(x, y) = E_0 (1 + 4x^2y) \quad (\text{W/m}^2)E(x,y)=E0​(1+4x2y)(W/m2)
where E0E_0E0​ is the baseline radiant irradiance measured at the origin corner (0,0)(0, 0)(0,0) in watts per square meter (W/m2\text{W/m}^2W/m2).

Step-by-Step Solution:

  1. Calculate the Surface Area of the Panel: State the Rectangular Area Formula:

    Area(R)=(bβˆ’a)(dβˆ’c)\text{Area}(R) = (b - a)(d - c)Area(R)=(bβˆ’a)(dβˆ’c)
    Substitute the domain limits x∈[0,0.5]x \in [0, 0.5]x∈[0,0.5] and y∈[0,0.4]y \in [0, 0.4]y∈[0,0.4]:
    Area(R)=(0.5βˆ’0)(0.4βˆ’0)=0.20Β m2\text{Area}(R) = (0.5 - 0)(0.4 - 0) = 0.20\text{ m}^2Area(R)=(0.5βˆ’0)(0.4βˆ’0)=0.20Β m2

  2. Evaluate Total Radiant Flux as an Iterated Double Integral: State Fubini's Theorem for Rectangular Regions (defined in Double Integrals over a Rectangular Region):

    Ξ¦=∬RE(x,y) dA=∫00.5∫00.4E0(1+4x2y) dy dx\Phi = \iint_R E(x, y) \, dA = \int_{0}^{0.5} \int_{0}^{0.4} E_0 (1 + 4x^2y) \, dy \, dxΞ¦=∬R​E(x,y)dA=∫00.5β€‹βˆ«00.4​E0​(1+4x2y)dydx
    Factor out the physical scalar constant E0E_0E0​ and evaluate the inner integral with respect to yyy, holding xxx constant:
    ∫00.4(1+4x2y) dy=[y+2x2y2]y=0y=0.4\int_{0}^{0.4} (1 + 4x^2y) \, dy = \left[ y + 2x^2y^2 \right]_{y=0}^{y=0.4}∫00.4​(1+4x2y)dy=[y+2x2y2]y=0y=0.4​
    Substitute limits:
    =(0.4+2x2(0.4)2)βˆ’0=0.4+2x2(0.16)=0.4+0.32x2= \Big(0.4 + 2x^2(0.4)^2\Big) - 0 = 0.4 + 2x^2(0.16) = 0.4 + 0.32x^2=(0.4+2x2(0.4)2)βˆ’0=0.4+2x2(0.16)=0.4+0.32x2
    Now evaluate the outer integral with respect to xxx:
    Ξ¦=E0∫00.5(0.4+0.32x2) dx=E0[0.4x+0.323x3]00.5\Phi = E_0 \int_{0}^{0.5} (0.4 + 0.32x^2) \, dx = E_0 \left[ 0.4x + \frac{0.32}{3}x^3 \right]_{0}^{0.5}Ξ¦=E0β€‹βˆ«00.5​(0.4+0.32x2)dx=E0​[0.4x+30.32​x3]00.5​
    Substitute x=0.5x = 0.5x=0.5:
    Ξ¦=E0(0.4(0.5)+0.323(0.5)3)=E0(0.20+0.323(0.125))\Phi = E_0 \left( 0.4(0.5) + \frac{0.32}{3}(0.5)^3 \right) = E_0 \left( 0.20 + \frac{0.32}{3}(0.125) \right)Ξ¦=E0​(0.4(0.5)+30.32​(0.5)3)=E0​(0.20+30.32​(0.125))
    =E0(0.20+0.043)=E0(0.603+0.043)=0.643E0Β W= E_0 \left( 0.20 + \frac{0.04}{3} \right) = E_0 \left( \frac{0.60}{3} + \frac{0.04}{3} \right) = \frac{0.64}{3} E_0\text{ W}=E0​(0.20+30.04​)=E0​(30.60​+30.04​)=30.64​E0​ W
    Ξ¦β‰ˆ0.2133E0Β W\Phi \approx 0.2133 E_0\text{ W}Ξ¦β‰ˆ0.2133E0​ W

  3. Compute the Spatial Average Irradiance (EavgE_{\text{avg}}Eavg​): State the Spatial Average Value Formula (defined in Double Integrals over a Rectangular Region):

    Eavg=1Area(R)∬RE(x,y) dAE_{\text{avg}} = \frac{1}{\text{Area}(R)} \iint_R E(x, y) \, dAEavg​=Area(R)1β€‹βˆ¬R​E(x,y)dA
    Substitute the total flux and surface area:
    Eavg=10.20(0.643E0)=5Γ—(0.643E0)=3.203E0=1615E0β‰ˆ1.0667E0Β W/m2E_{\text{avg}} = \frac{1}{0.20} \left( \frac{0.64}{3} E_0 \right) = 5 \times \left( \frac{0.64}{3} E_0 \right) = \frac{3.20}{3} E_0 = \frac{16}{15} E_0 \approx 1.0667 E_0\text{ W/m}^2Eavg​=0.201​(30.64​E0​)=5Γ—(30.64​E0​)=33.20​E0​=1516​E0β€‹β‰ˆ1.0667E0​ W/m2

Meaning of the Answer & Real-Life Application:

  • Quantitative Interpretation: The spatial average irradiance Eavg=1615E0β‰ˆ1.067E0E_{\text{avg}} = \frac{16}{15}E_0 \approx 1.067E_0Eavg​=1516​E0β€‹β‰ˆ1.067E0​ demonstrates that despite spatial irradiance variation across the display surface, the mean radiant emission per square meter is 6.67%6.67\%6.67% higher than the baseline corner intensity E0E_0E0​.
  • Engineering Application: In large-scale entertainment venue video walls, human visual perception is acutely sensitive to localized brightness gradients. Entertainment and electrical engineers use spatial average irradiance calculations to balance multi-channel LED driver pulse-width modulation (PWM) look-up tables and specify anti-glare optical diffusion film thickness, ensuring that viewer-perceived luminance remains uniform across all viewing angles.