◀ Back to Note

Tony's Intertwingled Memex • Reference Manual

Semiconductor Transistor Current Fluctuation (Electrical Engineering) Solution

Formulas & Definitions

In integrated circuit design, an advanced field-effect transistor (FET) regulates output current based on gate-to-source voltage (VgV_gVg​) and drain-to-source voltage (VdV_dVd​). In the saturation regime, the electrical drain current III (in milliamperes, mA\text{mA}mA) is modeled by the non-linear constitutive equation:

I(Vg,Vd)=Vg3+Vd2I(V_g, V_d) = \sqrt{V_g^3 + V_d^2}I(Vg​,Vd​)=Vg3​+Vd2​​

The transistor's nominal operating bias point (Q-point) is established at Vg=2.0 VV_g = 2.0\text{ V}Vg​=2.0 V and Vd=4.0 VV_d = 4.0\text{ V}Vd​=4.0 V, providing a baseline current of:

I(2,4)=23+42=8+16=24≈4.8990 mAI(2, 4) = \sqrt{2^3 + 4^2} = \sqrt{8 + 16} = \sqrt{24} \approx 4.8990\text{ mA}I(2,4)=23+42​=8+16​=24​≈4.8990 mA

During high-frequency switching, power rail switching noise causes the terminal voltages to shift slightly to an off-nominal state of Vg=2.02 VV_g = 2.02\text{ V}Vg​=2.02 V and Vd=3.95 VV_d = 3.95\text{ V}Vd​=3.95 V.

  1. State the multivariable total differential formula dIdIdI for the transistor current in terms of voltage differentials dVgdV_gdVg​ and dVddV_ddVd​.
  2. Compute the analytical partial derivatives ∂I∂Vg\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_g}∂Vg​∂I​ and ∂I∂Vd\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_d}∂Vd​∂I​, and evaluate them at the nominal bias point (2,4)(2, 4)(2,4).
  3. Use the linear approximation L(Vg,Vd)L(V_g, V_d)L(Vg​,Vd​) centered at (2,4)(2, 4)(2,4) to estimate the perturbed current I(2.02,3.95) mAI(2.02, 3.95)\text{ mA}I(2.02,3.95) mA.
  4. If manufacturer power rail tolerances guarantee ∣dVg∣≤0.05 V|dV_g| \le 0.05\text{ V}∣dVg​∣≤0.05 V and ∣dVd∣≤0.10 V|dV_d| \le 0.10\text{ V}∣dVd​∣≤0.10 V, compute the maximum worst-case current fluctuation ∣dI∣max⁡|dI|_{\max}∣dI∣max​.

Step-by-Step Solution:

  1. State the Total Differential Formula:

    • As defined in Differentials and Error Propagation, the total differential dIdIdI is:
      dI=∂I∂VgdVg+∂I∂VddVddI = \frac{\partial I}{\partial V_g} dV_g + \frac{\partial I}{\partial V_d} dV_ddI=∂Vg​∂I​dVg​+∂Vd​∂I​dVd​
  2. Compute Analytical Partial Derivatives:

    • Let u(Vg,Vd)=Vg3+Vd2u(V_g, V_d) = V_g^3 + V_d^2u(Vg​,Vd​)=Vg3​+Vd2​. Applying the Generalized Power Rule:
      ∂I∂Vg=12(Vg3+Vd2)−1/2(3Vg2)=3Vg22Vg3+Vd2\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_g} = \frac{1}{2}(V_g^3 + V_d^2)^{-1/2}(3V_g^2) = \frac{3V_g^2}{2\sqrt{V_g^3 + V_d^2}}∂Vg​∂I​=21​(Vg3​+Vd2​)−1/2(3Vg2​)=2Vg3​+Vd2​​3Vg2​​
      ∂I∂Vd=12(Vg3+Vd2)−1/2(2Vd)=VdVg3+Vd2\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_d} = \frac{1}{2}(V_g^3 + V_d^2)^{-1/2}(2V_d) = \frac{V_d}{\sqrt{V_g^3 + V_d^2}}∂Vd​∂I​=21​(Vg3​+Vd2​)−1/2(2Vd​)=Vg3​+Vd2​​Vd​​
    • Evaluate at (Vg,Vd)=(2,4)(V_g, V_d) = (2, 4)(Vg​,Vd​)=(2,4), where Vg3+Vd2=24=26\sqrt{V_g^3 + V_d^2} = \sqrt{24} = 2\sqrt{6}Vg3​+Vd2​​=24​=26​:
      ∂I∂Vg∣(2,4)=3(22)224=12224=624=36≈1.2247 mA/V\left.\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_g}\right|_{(2, 4)} = \frac{3(2^2)}{2\sqrt{24}} = \frac{12}{2\sqrt{24}} = \frac{6}{\sqrt{24}} = \frac{3}{\sqrt{6}} \approx 1.2247\text{ mA/V}∂Vg​∂I​​(2,4)​=224​3(22)​=224​12​=24​6​=6​3​≈1.2247 mA/V
      ∂I∂Vd∣(2,4)=424=26≈0.8165 mA/V\left.\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_d}\right|_{(2, 4)} = \frac{4}{\sqrt{24}} = \frac{2}{\sqrt{6}} \approx 0.8165\text{ mA/V}∂Vd​∂I​​(2,4)​=24​4​=6​2​≈0.8165 mA/V
  3. Construct Linear Approximation and Estimate Current:

    • Formulate the linearization function centered at (2,4)(2, 4)(2,4):
      L(Vg,Vd)=I(2,4)+∂I∂Vg∣(2,4)(Vg−2)+∂I∂Vd∣(2,4)(Vd−4)L(V_g, V_d) = I(2, 4) + \left.\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_g}\right|_{(2, 4)}(V_g - 2) + \left.\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_d}\right|_{(2, 4)}(V_d - 4)L(Vg​,Vd​)=I(2,4)+∂Vg​∂I​​(2,4)​(Vg​−2)+∂Vd​∂I​​(2,4)​(Vd​−4)
      L(Vg,Vd)=24+624(Vg−2)+424(Vd−4)L(V_g, V_d) = \sqrt{24} + \frac{6}{\sqrt{24}}(V_g - 2) + \frac{4}{\sqrt{24}}(V_d - 4)L(Vg​,Vd​)=24​+24​6​(Vg​−2)+24​4​(Vd​−4)
    • Calculate offsets for target point (2.02,3.95)(2.02, 3.95)(2.02,3.95):
      ΔVg=2.02−2.0=+0.02 V\Delta V_g = 2.02 - 2.0 = +0.02\text{ V}ΔVg​=2.02−2.0=+0.02 V
      ΔVd=3.95−4.0=−0.05 V\Delta V_d = 3.95 - 4.0 = -0.05\text{ V}ΔVd​=3.95−4.0=−0.05 V
    • Substitute offsets:
      L(2.02,3.95)=24+6(0.02)+4(−0.05)24=24+0.12−0.2024=24−0.0824L(2.02, 3.95) = \sqrt{24} + \frac{6(0.02) + 4(-0.05)}{\sqrt{24}} = \sqrt{24} + \frac{0.12 - 0.20}{\sqrt{24}} = \sqrt{24} - \frac{0.08}{\sqrt{24}}L(2.02,3.95)=24​+24​6(0.02)+4(−0.05)​=24​+24​0.12−0.20​=24​−24​0.08​
      L(2.02,3.95)≈4.89898−0.084.89898≈4.89898−0.01633≈4.8827 mAL(2.02, 3.95) \approx 4.89898 - \frac{0.08}{4.89898} \approx 4.89898 - 0.01633 \approx 4.8827\text{ mA}L(2.02,3.95)≈4.89898−4.898980.08​≈4.89898−0.01633≈4.8827 mA
  4. Compute Worst-Case Current Fluctuation:

    • Applying the Triangle Inequality for maximum error bound:
      ∣dI∣max⁡≤∣∂I∂Vg∣∣dVg∣+∣∂I∂Vd∣∣dVd∣|dI|_{\max} \le \left|\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_g}\right| |dV_g| + \left|\frac{\partial I}{\partial V_d}\right| |dV_d|∣dI∣max​≤​∂Vg​∂I​​∣dVg​∣+​∂Vd​∂I​​∣dVd​∣
      ∣dI∣max⁡≤(1.2247)(0.05)+(0.8165)(0.10)=0.06124+0.08165=0.1429 mA|dI|_{\max} \le (1.2247)(0.05) + (0.8165)(0.10) = 0.06124 + 0.08165 = 0.1429\text{ mA}∣dI∣max​≤(1.2247)(0.05)+(0.8165)(0.10)=0.06124+0.08165=0.1429 mA
    • The maximum current deviation due to power rail noise is bounded by approximately ±0.143 mA\pm 0.143\text{ mA}±0.143 mA (or 0.14294.8990×100%≈2.92%\frac{0.1429}{4.8990} \times 100\% \approx 2.92\%4.89900.1429​×100%≈2.92%).